🔗 Share this article

These times present a quite distinctive phenomenon: the first-ever US parade of the caretakers. They vary in their skills and traits, but they all share the common objective – to stop an Israeli infringement, or even demolition, of Gaza’s delicate peace agreement. Since the war ended, there have been rare days without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the scene. Just recently featured the presence of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all appearing to execute their assignments.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In only a few short period it launched a wave of strikes in the region after the deaths of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – resulting, based on accounts, in dozens of local injuries. Several officials demanded a renewal of the conflict, and the Knesset enacted a preliminary measure to annex the West Bank. The American reaction was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the US leadership seems more focused on upholding the existing, uneasy period of the peace than on moving to the following: the rebuilding of Gaza. Regarding that, it seems the US may have aspirations but little tangible strategies.

At present, it is unclear when the suggested international oversight committee will actually take power, and the similar is true for the designated peacekeeping troops – or even the makeup of its soldiers. On a recent day, a US official declared the United States would not force the structure of the foreign force on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s government keeps to reject one alternative after another – as it acted with the Ankara's offer lately – what follows? There is also the opposite point: which party will decide whether the forces supported by Israel are even willing in the mission?

The matter of how long it will need to neutralize the militant group is similarly unclear. “Our hope in the leadership is that the international security force is going to at this point assume responsibility in demilitarizing the organization,” said Vance recently. “That’s will require a while.” Trump only emphasized the ambiguity, declaring in an interview on Sunday that there is no “fixed” deadline for Hamas to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unknown elements of this yet-to-be-formed global force could deploy to Gaza while the organization's fighters continue to remain in control. Are they dealing with a administration or a militant faction? These are just a few of the issues arising. Others might wonder what the result will be for average civilians as things stand, with the group persisting to focus on its own opponents and critics.

Recent events have afresh underscored the blind spots of local media coverage on each side of the Gaza frontier. Every publication strives to analyze every possible aspect of the group's infractions of the truce. And, usually, the fact that the organization has been hindering the repatriation of the remains of deceased Israeli captives has taken over the news.

On the other hand, coverage of non-combatant casualties in Gaza stemming from Israeli operations has received little attention – or none. Take the Israeli counter actions following a recent southern Gaza event, in which two troops were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s authorities claimed dozens of fatalities, Israeli news pundits criticised the “limited reaction,” which focused on just facilities.

That is nothing new. Over the previous few days, the press agency alleged Israel of infringing the peace with the group 47 occasions since the truce came into effect, killing 38 Palestinians and wounding another many more. The allegation appeared irrelevant to most Israeli media outlets – it was just missing. Even reports that eleven members of a local family were fatally shot by Israeli forces recently.

Gaza’s rescue organization said the individuals had been attempting to go back to their residence in the a Gaza City area of Gaza City when the bus they were in was fired upon for reportedly going over the “yellow line” that marks zones under Israeli army authority. This yellow line is unseen to the naked eye and appears only on plans and in authoritative records – sometimes not obtainable to ordinary people in the region.

Even this incident scarcely rated a mention in Israeli journalism. One source mentioned it in passing on its website, referencing an IDF spokesperson who said that after a suspicious car was detected, troops discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the transport kept to approach the forces in a manner that created an imminent risk to them. The troops shot to neutralize the risk, in compliance with the truce.” No casualties were reported.

Given this framing, it is no surprise many Israelis believe the group alone is to responsible for infringing the ceasefire. This belief risks prompting appeals for a tougher strategy in Gaza.

At some point – perhaps in the near future – it will no longer be sufficient for American representatives to act as supervisors, instructing Israel what to avoid. They will {have to|need